1
Posts: 13
Threads: 5
Joined: March 20, 2010
Reputation:
0
Am I the only one that is frustrated with the lack mac software for SSB communications and the use of a pactor modem.
There is great software for navigation but nothing for SSB communications.
Without this missing communications piece getting filled in (without doing work arounds like running bootcamp and Windows) the mac adoption is not reaching its full potential.
Anyone else agree or I am missing something.
Steve
5
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 284
Joined: April 22, 2005
Reputation:
0
Good question. Why haven't the SailMail folks supported Mac?
We offered to port, but they never provided the technical details to work with their system.
Scott Dillon
Sydney Australia
North Shore 38
CYCA
1
Posts: 9
Threads: 1
Joined: April 5, 2007
Reputation:
0
Richard,
This would be a nice addition to the MacSailing community. Did you speak with Jim or Stan? Would you like me to follow up with them?
Cheers,
Doug
puppy training
5
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 284
Joined: April 22, 2005
Reputation:
0
I had ongoing discussions about three years ago with Jim. It went dead so we moved over to supporting GMN XGate and WeatherNet which is for use with Sat Phones. Nice thing with XGate is one can use any mail client they want.
Scott Dillon
Sydney Australia
North Shore 38
CYCA
1
Posts: 13
Threads: 5
Joined: March 20, 2010
Reputation:
0
what would it take to reengage?
How can users like myself help support this development opportunity besides being your first paying customers for this app?
Any emails we could send to show support?
Let us know what you need.
Steve
5
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 284
Joined: April 22, 2005
Reputation:
0
No plans to re-enagage, but I suspect if enough users ask SailMail for a native Mac OS X solution it will get done. Hopefully in a similar way to XGate such that it creates a local mail server on your Mac allowing any OS X mail client to be used.
Scott Dillon
Sydney Australia
North Shore 38
CYCA
5
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 284
Joined: April 22, 2005
Reputation:
0
I think it had a lot more to do with intellectual property than cost of equipment.
Scott Dillon
Sydney Australia
North Shore 38
CYCA
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
Should have added that was all pre-iPhone/iPad, so it's unlikely Rich would have the time anymore. I understand why he went to support xgate, but I find it just too expensive for a cruising budget. I also know virtually no cruisers with sat phones, and most of the one I did know got rid of them as just too expensive.
Scot
5
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 284
Joined: April 22, 2005
Reputation:
0
Scott Dillon
Sydney Australia
North Shore 38
CYCA
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
Rich,
I'm sure you're right, but I suspect a significant number of those are corporate users - I know both of my life's major employers used them extensively in their overseas operations - and still grumbled about the cost. Many more are on the mega yachts on Roche Harbor and elsewhere... Not many with the 'common' cruiser. If you look at the SSCA equipment survey (last in 2008), only about 15% have sat phones, a little over half of which are Irridium. Compare that to nearly 80% that have some sort of hf radio (ham or ssb). The survey is not a perfect source of data but probably the best you'll find for this.
Scot
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
I used parallels and fusion two years ago successfully on a trip, but since updating to Win7 everything came to a crawl with either. Even rolling back to XP didn't cure the problem and I got very frustrated trying to fix it, to the point I gave up. Was simply easier to use the eepc my son gave me (his old one). Much less frustration. Uses less power anyway.
Have't tried wine, but at this point I'm not willing to waste any more time with it. Just too frustrating. Rather play with my iPad.
Scot
1
Posts: 9
Threads: 1
Joined: February 10, 2010
Reputation:
0
Fusion and Parallels have both come a long way and the hardware just keeps getting better and better. Though, I am disappointed that Apple chose to put another Core 2 Duo in the new Mac Mini instead of the new i5 processor which is much more efficient and faster. I have had Windows XP and Bootcamp with Parallels which has worked out fairly well when I need it. As a software developer, I sometimes have to work on Windows stuff, but now I rarely boot into XP anymore, I just use Parallels.