1
Posts: 16
Threads: 1
Joined: March 19, 2006
Reputation:
0
I have been trying to get some wifi access aboard for some time. Quickertek got some bad press c/o cost and not working very well. Other solution were complex and/or expensive. Well I am now using the QUICKY by Quickertek. Small metal box the size if half a cigaret pack with 4" antenna on top and usb cable from bottom. Load driver and plug into usb port. About $200!
I am at end of dock about 1000yds from hotel and I could only get one sporadic and useless signal if I held powerbook up high on bow. Now PB is back in cabinet and QUICKY is hanging in companionway pulling in 12 local wifi signals with great quality and strength. Apple Airport is about 50 MW and QUICKY is 500MW. Works better than I expected. See Quickertek.com
1
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: May 18, 2005
Reputation:
0
We just started using the iQuicky & are pleased with its performance also. At first I tested it inside a house without its own wi-fi to see if it could "see" any networks. I was ready to send it back when it showed no more networks than what the built-in Airport showed on my iBook. But when we got to the boat, which is anchored out in the harbor about 300 yards from shore, the iQuicky was able to see many networks, more than Airport by far. We do not know where the wi-fi network we use most often originates, but the iQuicky can grab it, hang onto it, & reconnect when it fades away due to movement of the boat in the wind. We were even able to see video call on Skype with its 7" antenna hanging in front of a closed portlight!
We've ordered a higher gain antenna & ten-foot cable in order to get the antenna higher & outside the boat. We are looking forward to even more ability to use wi-fi from the boat.
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
Did either of you have any difficulties getting your Quicky to work? I just got one and couldn't get it to work with either my ibook or Macbook. Got a connection OK but neither Safari or Firefox would recognize the connection. So far they've been responsive and I'm sending it back for them to check out, but I'm a bit disappointed right now. Otherwise it looks like an ideal solution.
Scot
1
Posts: 16
Threads: 1
Joined: March 19, 2006
Reputation:
0
The obvious solutions are to make sure the Airport is turned off and I found that the Quicky likes its own private usb port. Mine had to go back for some tweaking but I think the problem was mainly not getting the antenna up and out far enough. Safari works well but I can even use my aol settings from home and bore into the hotel wireless system directly. Keep us posted.
Lou
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
OK, got it back and now works fine. Have to admit the service was quick - sent it off on Monday and had it back Friday, though there wasn't any enclosure to indicate they did anything. Also, since Lou had to send his back for 'tweaking' I'm left thinking they could use a bit better quality control on the front end. In the end, however, it works as advertised.
Scot
1
Posts: 16
Threads: 1
Joined: March 19, 2006
Reputation:
0
Scott,
I am glad to hear that your unit is ok and "as advertised".
They never told me what they did to mine either. Mine seemed ok at first then went south. The lady in tech support was very nice but the barcuda that usually answers the phone was not exactly "Mr Helpful" . Weird company but seemingly a good product. Less complex than others and better priced than most now. Good luck.
Lou
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
OK, after having to use my not-so-Quickertek for the summer I'm about to throw it overboard. The connections are frequently dropped, some open hotspots it will connect but won't give me internet access (even though I can do so sitting in the same place with the built-in Airport on my Macbook), and it's usually markedly slower than my airport (again measured from the same place). Anyone else having this experience? Anybody have a good portable USB option?
Scot
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
Jim,
Thanks for your comments. I'll try bbxpress first since I'm using them these days. I'm currently anchored in Friday Harbor after a summer cruise to the Charlottes & back via the west coast. I can't seem to get Jaga to turn back to Port Townsend so I think she's telling me I now living aboard full time; thus a better solution is a bit more essential. I hear Princess Louisa is gorgeous in January...
Any other's find a good solution?
Scot
3
Posts: 94
Threads: 5
Joined: October 1, 2005
Reputation:
2
Quentin I look forward to your report. Best of luck.
What made you buy the one with the external antenna versus the internal antenna?
Jim
1
Posts: 23
Threads: 1
Joined: April 25, 2005
Reputation:
0
The external antenna socket lets you add a higher gain antenna and if the system works I was thinking of mounting the box just below the masthead with a higher gain antenna up top with the VHF aerial.
3
Posts: 94
Threads: 5
Joined: October 1, 2005
Reputation:
2
Ahso... I look forward to your report.
5
Posts: 332
Threads: 39
Joined: February 27, 2006
Reputation:
0
Quentin,
The Engenious website doesn't mention support for Mac's, but obviously you have it running, as does the guy on the Panbo site. Did you get a driver from Engenious or a third party (or did it not need one)? From Panbo's site it looks like the management interface is web based so no problem there. Also, I note it uses 120 - how did you wire it in? Having 120 going up the mast would concern me a bit...or is it an external power supply that stays below deck?
BTW - ran some clean-up utilities the other day (been a bit negligent there...) and my Quickertek is running better, but not what I had expected.
Scot
1
Posts: 16
Threads: 1
Joined: June 14, 2006
Reputation:
0
Hi Quentin, Aaron Here...
glad to hear you had some success with the engenius. Please CC me when you test it. I've yet to decide if I should put mine at the masthead.
1
Posts: 23
Threads: 1
Joined: April 25, 2005
Reputation:
0
So far so good, this post is brought to you via an Engenius 3220 EXT with an omnidirectional high gain antenna, hoisted 4 metres up the courtesy flag halyard, I am probably insulting an entire nation by hoisting such an ungainly mess but hey ho it was worth it to test the system.
I have no idea where the access point is located, it is a commercial alltelecom.fr access point.
The power over ethernet box is being fed by a 12v dc - 48 v dc converter plugged into a 12v socket on board. This means that the next test will be done underway to see just how far from the marina we can sail before losing signal.
We shall also do some comparison tests by hauling it up to the top of the mast (15 metres).
1
Posts: 18
Threads: 0
Joined: July 12, 2007
Reputation:
0
Very interesting.
Thanks for all the tests, even if it comes back to the obvious :o
But... maybe, just maybe, the high gain antenna has a narrower vertical 'beam width' so that really local access points get 'overlooked' as it were. As they might be quite low down, from your mast height you'd need to be looking down at an angle to see them.
Just a thought.
Ron
1
Posts: 18
Threads: 0
Joined: July 12, 2007
Reputation:
0
Just one other thing...
I'm very interested in all this, but I need a unit that either has an ethernet connection or a USB.
Ron